Stanford Cardinal predictions, stats & recaps

The next published prediction, recent scores and saved game recaps, plus verified handicappers who know Stanford Cardinal.

Recorded performance

Results summary

Last 5 years of recorded results. W-L-T means wins, losses, and ties; ATS W-L-P means wins, losses, and pushes; totals O-U-P means overs, unders, and pushes. ATS and totals use saved SportsJaw lines, and missing scores or lines are excluded from that sample.

SplitResults (W-L-T)ATS (W-L-P)Totals (O-U-P)

Overall14-44-0 58 games18-39-1 58 with lines30-27-1 58 with lines

Home9-21-0 30 games11-18-1 30 with lines18-12-0 30 with lines

Away5-23-0 28 games7-21-0 28 with lines12-15-1 28 with lines

Last 103-7-0 10 games5-5-0 10 with lines7-3-0 10 with lines

The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed Stanford Cardinal games in SportsJaw recorded history.

Game recaps

Stanford Cardinal: last five games

Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results

Oct 3, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Stanford CardinalSTANFO	3	+480 L	+14.5 (-110) L	O 53.5 (-115) W U 53.5 (-105) L
Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE	57	-690 W	-14.5 (-110) W	O 53.5 (-115) W U 53.5 (-105) L

Wake Forest Demon Deacons defeated Stanford Cardinal 57-3

Wake Forest Demon Deacons defeated Stanford Cardinal 57-3 on October 3, 2026, a 54-point decision in the series. Wake Forest Demon Deacons' strongest period was the 1st quarter, when it outscored its opponent 15-0. Against SportsJaw's recorded Stanford Cardinal +14.5 (-110) spread, Wake Forest Demon Deacons covered, while the 60 combined points finished over the recorded total of 53.5.

Team	1	2	3	4	T
STANFO	0	3	0	0	3
WAKE	15	14	14	14	57

Sept 26, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Georgia Tech Yellow JacketsGATECH	27	-155 L	-3 (-110) L	O 48.5 (-110) W U 48.5 (-110) L
Stanford CardinalSTANFO	34	+135 W	+3 (-110) W	O 48.5 (-110) W U 48.5 (-110) L

Stanford Cardinal defeated Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 34-27

Stanford Cardinal defeated Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 34-27 on September 26, 2026, a 7-point decision in the series. Stanford Cardinal's strongest period was the 3rd quarter, when it outscored its opponent 17-0. Against SportsJaw's recorded Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets -3 (-110) spread, Stanford Cardinal covered, while the 61 combined points finished over the recorded total of 48.5.

Team	1	2	3	4	T
GATECH	10	10	0	7	27
STANFO	7	3	17	7	34

Sept 19, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Stanford CardinalSTANFO	7	+306 L	+10 (-110) L	O 51 (-110) L U 51 (-110) W
Duke Blue DevilsDUKE	35	-385 W	-10 (-108) W	O 51 (-110) L U 51 (-110) W

Duke Blue Devils defeated Stanford Cardinal 35-7

Duke Blue Devils defeated Stanford Cardinal 35-7 on September 19, 2026, a 28-point decision in the series. Duke Blue Devils' strongest period was the 3rd quarter, when it outscored its opponent 14-0. Against SportsJaw's recorded Stanford Cardinal +10 (-110) spread, Duke Blue Devils covered, while the 42 combined points finished under the recorded total of 51.

Team	1	2	3	4	T
STANFO	0	7	0	0	7
DUKE	0	14	14	7	35

Sept 4, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Miami HurricanesMIA	45	-4000 W	-24.5 (-110) W	O 46.5 (-110) W U 46.5 (-110) L
Stanford CardinalSTANFO	6	+1450 L	+24.5 (-110) L	O 46.5 (-110) W U 46.5 (-110) L

Aug 29, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Hawaii RainbowsHAW	27	+170 L	+4.5 (-110) L	O 48.5 (-110) W U 48.5 (-110) L
Stanford CardinalSTANFO	37	-200 W	-4.5 (-110) W	O 48.5 (-110) W U 48.5 (-110) L

Verified performance

Experts who know the Cardinal

Ranked by verified profit on games involving this team

PeytoncExpert grade89+$1,657 · 10 picks7–3 W–L · 70.0%2

Fisher49Expert grade88+$1,468 · 10 picks7–3 W–L · 70.0%3

Novacek84Expert grade83+$1,082 · 14 picks6–8 W–L · 42.9%

RankHandicapperW–L / Win %GradeProfit

4MauriceJones6–1 W–L · 85.7%6–1 W–L · 85.7%80+$3,318 5Oddsshark45–32 W–L · 58.4%45–32 W–L · 58.4%78+$836 6Rcobbett2210–3 W–L · 76.9%10–3 W–L · 76.9%76+$808 7Simonsays6–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%75+$2,128 8Coolio35–26 W–L · 57.4%35–26 W–L · 57.4%72+$499 9Dtownsend4–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%66+$998 10Miamimike6–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%66+$955 11Covers22–17 W–L · 56.4%22–17 W–L · 56.4%65+$320 12Captainobvious17–13 W–L · 56.7%17–13 W–L · 56.7%63+$270 13Vegaspat4–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%53+$1,409 14Bagel Man5–1 W–L · 83.3%5–1 W–L · 83.3%51+$1,309 15Mtgoldstein4–1 W–L · 80.0%4–1 W–L · 80.0%50+$2,877 16Roderick8064–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%50+$1,127 17Tjwins3–2 W–L · 60.0%3–2 W–L · 60.0%49+$2,527 18Tpham5–0 W–L · 100.0%5–0 W–L · 100.0%48+$2,453 19DemarcusBryant5–0 W–L · 100.0%5–0 W–L · 100.0%47+$2,055 20Maddog4–1 W–L · 80.0%4–1 W–L · 80.0%42+$1,182

Expert grades use verified net profit on settled picks involving Stanford Cardinal, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.