| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami HurricanesMIA | 41 | -700 W | -14 (-115) W | O 49 (-110) W U 49 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 13 | +500 L | +14 (-105) L |
Miami Hurricanes defeated Clemson Tigers 41-13
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 10 | 7 | 7 | 17 | 41 |
| CLEM | 3 | 3 |
The next published prediction, recent scores and saved game recaps, plus verified handicappers who know Clemson Tigers.
Last 5 years of recorded results. W-L-T means wins, losses, and ties; ATS W-L-P means wins, losses, and pushes; totals O-U-P means overs, unders, and pushes. ATS and totals use saved SportsJaw lines, and missing scores or lines are excluded from that sample.
The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed Clemson Tigers games in SportsJaw recorded history.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami HurricanesMIA | 41 | -700 W | -14 (-115) W | O 49 (-110) W U 49 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 13 | +500 L | +14 (-105) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 10 | 7 | 7 | 17 | 41 |
| CLEM | 3 | 3 |
Expert grades use verified net profit on settled picks involving Clemson Tigers, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 13 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 24 | -140 W | -2.5 (-115) W | O 52 (-110) L U 52 (-110) W |
| California Golden BearsCAL | 10 | +120 L | +2.5 (-105) L |
Clemson Tigers defeated California Golden Bears 24-10 on September 25, 2026, a 14-point decision in the series. Clemson Tigers' strongest period was the 2nd quarter, when it outscored its opponent 10-0. Against SportsJaw's recorded Clemson Tigers -2.5 (-115) spread, Clemson Tigers covered, while the 34 combined points finished under the recorded total of 52.
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 0 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 24 |
| CAL | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 20 | +127 L | +3 (-110) L | O 44.5 (-110) W U 44.5 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 28 | -147 W | -3 (-108) W |
Clemson Tigers defeated North Carolina Tar Heels 28-20 on September 19, 2026, a 8-point decision in the series. Clemson Tigers' strongest period was the 4th quarter, when it outscored its opponent 13-3. Against SportsJaw's recorded North Carolina Tar Heels +3 (-110) spread, Clemson Tigers covered, while the 48 combined points finished over the recorded total of 44.5.
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 14 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 |
| CLEM | 3 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 28 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Southern EaglesGASOU | 7 | +836 L | +19.5 (-110) W | O 54.5 (-105) L U 54.5 (-112) W |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 22 | -1400 W | -19.5 (-110) L |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 10 | +314 L | +10 (-110) L | O 49 (-110) W U 49 (-110) L |
| LSU TigersLSU | 51 | -380 W | -10 (-110) W |
Ranked by verified profit on games involving this team
EmcExpert grade99+$4,100 · 10 picks8–2 W–L · 80.0%2
StevehExpert grade97+$2,559 · 11 picks7–4 W–L · 63.6%3
Mr_BiggsExpert grade93+$1,331 · 17 picks13–4 W–L · 76.5%
Simonsays7–3 W–L · 70.0%7–3 W–L · 70.0%89+$9505
DerekFisher7–2 W–L · 77.8%7–2 W–L · 77.8%88+$3,1336
Drpaul6–3 W–L · 66.7%6–3 W–L · 66.7%86+$1,8037
Bichaelbarney7–2 W–L · 77.8%7–2 W–L · 77.8%80+$8808
Mickey6196–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%79+$3,7129
Fisher495–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%78+$2,58210
Rcobbett2214–6 W–L · 70.0%14–6 W–L · 70.0%76+$26411
Rc6–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%73+$1,21712
Gustavosinto6–5 W–L · 54.5%6–5 W–L · 54.5%73+$20913
Rainman7–0 W–L · 100.0%7–0 W–L · 100.0%70+$4,44114
Covers27–23 W–L · 54.0%27–23 W–L · 54.0%70+$18115
AdrianMariucci6–1 W–L · 85.7%6–1 W–L · 85.7%69+$3,22316
Brycet5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%69+$72717
JoeyBerg5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%66+$1,35518
Moneymouth4–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%62+$90519
Novacek846–0 W–L · 100.0%6–0 W–L · 100.0%60+$4,77320
Purpleblood4–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%60+$577
