Ill.-Chicago Flames predictions, stats & recaps

The next published prediction, recent scores and saved game recaps, plus verified handicappers who know Ill.-Chicago Flames.

Recorded performance

Results summary

Last 5 years of recorded results. W-L-T means wins, losses, and ties; ATS W-L-P means wins, losses, and pushes; totals O-U-P means overs, unders, and pushes. ATS and totals use saved SportsJaw lines, and missing scores or lines are excluded from that sample.

SplitResults (W-L-T)ATS (W-L-P)Totals (O-U-P)

Overall60-81-0 141 games73-65-3 141 with lines77-64-0 141 with lines

Home29-33-0 62 games30-31-1 62 with lines32-30-0 62 with lines

Away31-48-0 79 games43-34-2 79 with lines45-34-0 79 with lines

Last 106-4-0 10 games6-4-0 10 with lines5-5-0 10 with lines

The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed Ill.-Chicago Flames games in SportsJaw recorded history.

Game recaps

Ill.-Chicago Flames: last five games

Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results

Mar 18, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI	73	+230 L	+6.5 (-110) L	O 151 (-110) W U 151 (-110) L
California Golden BearsCAL	91	-280 W	-6.5 (-110) W	O 151 (-110) W U 151 (-110) L

California Golden Bears defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 91-73

California Golden Bears defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 91-73 on March 18, 2026, a 18-point decision in the series. California Golden Bears' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 52-38. Against SportsJaw's recorded Ill.-Chicago Flames +6.5 (-110) spread, California Golden Bears covered, while the 164 combined points finished over the recorded total of 151.

Team	1	2	T
ILCHI	35	38	73
CAL	39	52	91

Mar 8, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Northern Iowa PanthersNIOWA	84	-155 W	-2.5 (-110) W	O 126 (-110) W U 126 (-110) L
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI	69	+130 L	+2.5 (-110) L	O 126 (-110) W U 126 (-110) L

Northern Iowa Panthers defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 84-69

Northern Iowa Panthers defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 84-69 on March 8, 2026, a 15-point decision in the series. Northern Iowa Panthers' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 36-28. Against SportsJaw's recorded Northern Iowa Panthers -2.5 (-110) spread, Northern Iowa Panthers covered, while the 153 combined points finished over the recorded total of 126.

Team	1	2	T
NIOWA	48	36	84
ILCHI	41	28	69

Mar 7, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Drake BulldogsDRAKE	51	+160 L	+4.5 (-110) L	O 144.5 (-110) L U 144.5 (-110) W
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI	72	-185 W	-4.5 (-110) W	O 144.5 (-110) L U 144.5 (-110) W

Ill.-Chicago Flames defeated Drake Bulldogs 72-51

Ill.-Chicago Flames defeated Drake Bulldogs 72-51 on March 7, 2026, a 21-point decision in the series. Ill.-Chicago Flames' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 38-24. Against SportsJaw's recorded Drake Bulldogs +4.5 (-110) spread, Ill.-Chicago Flames covered, while the 123 combined points finished under the recorded total of 144.5.

Team	1	2	T
DRAKE	27	24	51
ILCHI	34	38	72

Mar 6, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI	92	-108 W	0 (-110) W	O 150.5 (-110) W U 150.5 (-110) L
Murray St. RacersMURRAY	79	-111 L	0 (-110) L	O 150.5 (-110) W U 150.5 (-110) L

Mar 1, 2026	Score	Moneyline	Spread	Game total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI	63	-180 L	-4 (-110) L	O 144.5 (-110) L U 144.5 (-110) W
Indiana St. SycamoresINDST	79	+157 W	+4 (-110) W	O 144.5 (-110) L U 144.5 (-110) W

Verified performance

Experts who know the Flames

Ranked by verified profit on games involving this team

RoycejacobsExpert grade91+$1,407 · 11 picks7–4 W–L · 63.6%2

Sarah_MillerExpert grade79+$4,000 · 8 picks7–1 W–L · 87.5%3

StevedExpert grade79+$2,682 · 8 picks6–1 W–L · 85.7%

RankHandicapperW–L / Win %GradeProfit

4Mackintosh5–4 W–L · 55.6%5–4 W–L · 55.6%77+$910 5Novacek844–4 W–L · 50.0%4–4 W–L · 50.0%72+$1,307 6Averagejoe5–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%72+$1,273 7Drfeelgood6–1 W–L · 85.7%6–1 W–L · 85.7%70+$4,500 8Uncledavid7–0 W–L · 100.0%7–0 W–L · 100.0%69+$3,727 9Thetotaler5–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%69+$979 10Mickeyt6–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%69+$955 11Doclocks5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%65+$1,645 12Mr_Biggs5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%64+$1,337 13DemarcusBryant5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%62+$1,173 14Mtgoldstein3–4 W–L · 42.9%3–4 W–L · 42.9%62+$1,073 15Lockpicker695–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%60+$477 16Irishblue5–1 W–L · 83.3%5–1 W–L · 83.3%59+$2,555 17Teddy7184–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%58+$2,082 18Jtpham4–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%58+$859 19Peytonc5–1 W–L · 83.3%5–1 W–L · 83.3%56+$1,582 20Miamimike4–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%50+$864

Expert grades use verified net profit on settled picks involving Ill.-Chicago Flames, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.