The next published prediction, recent scores and saved game recaps, plus verified handicappers who know Ill.-Chicago Flames.
Last 5 years of recorded results. W-L-T means wins, losses, and ties; ATS W-L-P means wins, losses, and pushes; totals O-U-P means overs, unders, and pushes. ATS and totals use saved SportsJaw lines, and missing scores or lines are excluded from that sample.
The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed Ill.-Chicago Flames games in SportsJaw recorded history.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 61 | +230 L | +6.5 (-110) L | O 151.5 (-106) L U 151.5 (-115) W |
| St. MarysSMC | 84 | -280 W | -6.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago Flames | 24 | 37 | 61 |
| St. Marys | 42 | 42 | 84 |
Expert grades use verified net profit on settled picks involving Ill.-Chicago Flames, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC Greensboro SpartansNCGRE | 72 | +1453 L | +20 (-110) W | O 148 (-110) W U 148 (-110) L |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 82 | -4000 W | -20 (-110) L |
Ill.-Chicago Flames defeated UNC Greensboro Spartans 82-72 on November 9, 2026, a 10-point decision in the series. Ill.-Chicago Flames' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 49-40. Against SportsJaw's recorded UNC Greensboro Spartans +20 (-110) spread, UNC Greensboro Spartans covered, while the 154 combined points finished over the recorded total of 148.
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNC Greensboro Spartans | 32 | 40 | 72 |
| Ill.-Chicago Flames | 33 | 49 | 82 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Morris ColonialsROBMO | 56 | +460 L | +10.5 (-110) L | O 142.5 (-110) L U 142.5 (-110) W |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 79 | -650 W | -10.5 (-110) W |
Ill.-Chicago Flames defeated Robert Morris Colonials 79-56 on November 6, 2026, a 23-point decision in the series. Ill.-Chicago Flames' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 49-24. Against SportsJaw's recorded Robert Morris Colonials +10.5 (-110) spread, Ill.-Chicago Flames covered, while the 135 combined points finished under the recorded total of 142.5.
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Morris Colonials | 32 | 24 | 56 |
| Ill.-Chicago Flames | 30 | 49 | 79 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 73 | +230 L | +6.5 (-110) L | O 151 (-110) W U 151 (-110) L |
| California Golden BearsCAL | 91 | -280 W | -6.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Iowa PanthersNIOWA | 84 | -155 W | -2.5 (-110) W | O 126 (-110) W U 126 (-110) L |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 69 | +130 L | +2.5 (-110) L |
Ranked by verified profit on games involving this team
RoycejacobsExpert grade92+$1,407 · 11 picks7–4 W–L · 63.6%2
Sarah_MillerExpert grade79+$4,000 · 8 picks7–1 W–L · 87.5%3
StevedExpert grade79+$2,682 · 8 picks6–1 W–L · 85.7%
Thetotaler5–4 W–L · 55.6%5–4 W–L · 55.6%74+$8795
Averagejoe5–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%72+$1,2736
Doclocks5–3 W–L · 62.5%5–3 W–L · 62.5%71+$1,1457
Drfeelgood6–1 W–L · 85.7%6–1 W–L · 85.7%70+$4,5008
Uncledavid7–0 W–L · 100.0%7–0 W–L · 100.0%69+$3,7279
Mickeyt6–2 W–L · 75.0%6–2 W–L · 75.0%68+$95510
Novacek844–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%67+$1,85711
Mackintosh4–4 W–L · 50.0%4–4 W–L · 50.0%65+$81012
Lockpicker695–4 W–L · 55.6%5–4 W–L · 55.6%65+$37713
Rcollins4–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%64+$1,39914
Mr_Biggs5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%64+$1,33715
DemarcusBryant5–2 W–L · 71.4%5–2 W–L · 71.4%62+$1,17316
Drpaul4–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%62+$1,14917
Teddy7184–3 W–L · 57.1%4–3 W–L · 57.1%61+$1,08218
Mtgoldstein3–4 W–L · 42.9%3–4 W–L · 42.9%61+$1,07319
Irishblue5–1 W–L · 83.3%5–1 W–L · 83.3%59+$2,55520
Jtpham4–2 W–L · 66.7%4–2 W–L · 66.7%57+$859
