| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 49 | -1600 W | -21 (-110) W | O 63.5 (-110) L U 63.5 (-110) W |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 14 | +900 L | +21 (-110) L |
Clemson Tigers defeated Wake Forest Demon Deacons 49-14
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 49 | -1600 W | -21 (-110) W | O 63.5 (-110) L U 63.5 (-110) W |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 14 | +900 L | +21 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|
| CLEM | 0 | 28 | 14 | 7 | 49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 12 | +890 L | +21 (-110) W | O 53.5 (-110) L U 53.5 (-110) W |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 17 | -1600 W | -21 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 |
| CLEM | 0 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 17 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 51 | -298 W | -7.5 (-110) L | O 58 (-110) W U 58 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 45 | +245 L | +7.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 14 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 51 |
| WAKE | 7 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 45 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 27 | +150 L | +3.5 (-110) L | O 57 (-110) W U 57 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 48 | -172 W | -3.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEM | 37 | -12500 W | -34.5 (-110) L | O 59 (-110) L U 59 (-110) W |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 13 | +2097 L | +34.5 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
Mr_BiggsWeighted grade35+$517 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%2
CoolioWeighted grade33-$28 · 6 picks3–3 W–L · 50.0%3
RainmanWeighted grade30+$455 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
Barry7131–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$9095
DerekFisher1–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$2506
Simonsays1–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$2277
Eljefe1–0 W–L · 100.0%26+$9098
Tpham1–0 W–L · 100.0%26+$9099
Oddsshark3–5 W–L · 37.5%26-$24810
Miamimike1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$50011
Gustavosinto1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$10012
Jtgarcia1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$9113
Hopkinspicks1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$90914
Rc1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$22715
Steveh1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$9116
Dawhiz1–0 W–L · 100.0%22+$45517
Ironcladlocks1–0 W–L · 100.0%22+$45518
Rcobbett221–1 W–L · 50.0%20-$16419
16930207491–0 W–L · 100.0%16+$10020
Bjenkins0–1 W–L · 0.0%14-$250Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.