| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 64 | -125 W | -1.5 (-110) W | O 140.5 (-110) L U 140.5 (-110) W |
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 61 | +105 L | +1.5 (-110) L |
Clemson Tigers defeated Syracuse Orange 64-61
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEMS | 29 | 35 | 64 |
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 64 | -125 W | -1.5 (-110) W | O 140.5 (-110) L U 140.5 (-110) W |
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 61 | +105 L | +1.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEMS | 29 | 35 | 64 |
| SYR | 28 | 33 | 61 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 72 | +950 L | +16 (-110) W | O 140 (-110) W U 140 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 86 | -1800 W | -16 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYR | 29 | 43 | 72 |
| CLEMS | 48 | 38 | 86 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 75 | +400 L | +10 (-110) L | O 153 (-110) W U 153 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 90 | -550 W | -10 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYR | 30 | 45 | 75 |
| CLEMS | 42 | 48 | 90 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 77 | -183 W | -4 (-110) W | O 153.5 (-110) L U 153.5 (-110) W |
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 68 | +160 L | +4 (-110) L |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syracuse OrangeSYR | 73 | +175 L | +5 (-110) L | O 146 (-110) W U 146 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 91 | -205 W | -5 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
CoversWeighted grade44+$363 · 6 picks5–1 W–L · 83.3%2
KylekWeighted grade37+$1,000 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%3
JohnTharpWeighted grade37+$280 · 3 picks1–2 W–L · 33.3%Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.