| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice OwlsRICE | 72 | +173 L | +5 (-110) L | O 145.5 (-110) W U 145.5 (-110) L |
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 80 | -200 W | -5 (-110) W |
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs defeated Rice Owls 80-72
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICE | 28 |
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice OwlsRICE | 72 | +173 L | +5 (-110) L | O 145.5 (-110) W U 145.5 (-110) L |
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 80 | -200 W | -5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICE | 28 |
| 44 |
| 72 |
| LATEC | 44 | 36 | 80 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 88 | +122 W | +2.5 (-110) W | O 154.5 (-110) W U 154.5 (-110) L |
| Rice OwlsRICE | 82 | -145 L | -2.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LATEC | 41 | 28 | 19 | 88 |
| RICE | 40 | 29 | 13 | 82 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 83 | -210 W | -5 (-110) L | O 153.5 (-110) W U 153.5 (-110) L |
| Rice OwlsRICE | 79 | +175 L | +5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| LATEC | 34 | 49 | 83 |
| RICE | 27 | 52 | 79 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice OwlsRICE | 63 | +440 L | +10.5 (-110) L | O 149 (-110) L U 149 (-110) W |
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 80 | -593 W | -10.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice OwlsRICE | 58 | +600 L | +12 (-110) L | O 147 (-110) L U 147 (-110) W |
| Louisiana Tech BulldogsLATEC | 79 | -800 W | -12 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
OddssharkWeighted grade72+$363 · 10 picks7–3 W–L · 70.0%2
HitmanhartWeighted grade33+$909 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%3
CoolioWeighted grade31-$56 · 8 picks4–4 W–L · 50.0%
Barry7131–0 W–L · 100.0%30+$4555
Tgodfrey1–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$4556
Novacek841–0 W–L · 100.0%26+$917
Captainobvious2–2 W–L · 50.0%25-$208
Covers3–4 W–L · 42.9%25-$1489
Ua20041–1 W–L · 50.0%23-$1010
JackCohen1–0 W–L · 100.0%18+$9111
Vfernandez1–0 W–L · 100.0%16+$9112
Drpaul0–1 W–L · 0.0%16-$11013
Jtmcentire1–0 W–L · 100.0%15+$10014
Mr_Biggs1–0 W–L · 100.0%12+$7615
Iamlpicks1–1 W–L · 50.0%11-$6616
Dpxsports0–1 W–L · 0.0%11-$11017
Cassanoking1–0 W–L · 100.0%9+$10018
Wooish0–1 W–L · 0.0%9-$11019
Drew_Westcott0–1 W–L · 0.0%8-$55020
Bjp9311–0 W–L · 100.0%6+$100Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.