| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 79 | +140 L | +3 (-110) L | O 165.5 (-110) W U 165.5 (-110) L |
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 88 | -162 W | -3 (-110) W |
Charleston Cougars defeated William & Mary Tribe 88-79
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| w&m |
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 79 | +140 L | +3 (-110) L | O 165.5 (-110) W U 165.5 (-110) L |
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 88 | -162 W | -3 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| w&m |
| 32 |
| 47 |
| 79 |
| COLCH | 46 | 42 | 88 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 75 | -125 L | -1.25 (-110) L | O 167.75 (-110) L U 167.75 (-110) W |
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 90 | +103 W | +1.25 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLCH | 39 | 36 | 75 |
| w&m | 41 | 49 | 90 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 57 | +1000 L | +16.5 (-110) W | O 148 (-110) L U 148 (-110) W |
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 65 | -2225 W | -16.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| w&m | 26 | 31 | 57 |
| COLCH | 25 | 40 | 65 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 84 | -875 W | -12.5 (-110) L | O 152 (-110) W U 152 (-110) L |
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 83 | +588 L | +12.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William & Mary Tribew&m | 54 | +900 L | +16.5 (-110) L | O 145.5 (-110) L U 145.5 (-110) W |
| Charleston CougarsCOLCH | 82 | -1600 W | -16.5 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
IrishblueWeighted grade37+$1,364 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%2
JohnnywalkerWeighted grade36+$1,818 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%3
Randy54Weighted grade35+$2,273 · 3 picks3–0 W–L · 100.0%
Jw1–0 W–L · 100.0%30+$9095
Johnmizner2–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$9096
Mackintosh1–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$9097
Averagejoe2–0 W–L · 100.0%27+$1,8188
Coolio4–2 W–L · 66.7%27+$1549
Covers2–3 W–L · 40.0%27-$13810
Mickey6192–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$1,81811
Novacek841–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$90912
Georgew1–0 W–L · 100.0%23+$45513
Oddsshark2–5 W–L · 28.6%23-$33914
Badman1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$90915
Dtownsend1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$90916
Roycejacobs1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$90917
Flyigglesfly1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$45518
Lockpicker691–1 W–L · 50.0%20+$40919
Jeffjackson1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$90920
Jaredkuntz1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$455Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.