Campbell Fighting Camels vs
Northeastern HuskiesPredictions & Preview

Campbell Fighting Camels Set to Battle Northeastern Huskies in Coastal Athletic Association Showdown at Matthews Arena

The Campbell Fighting Camels will face off against the Northeastern Huskies in an important Coastal Athletic Association matchup at Matthews Arena on Thursday. Campbell is coming off a seven-game winning streak, while Northeastern has been inconsistent in their recent games. Both teams have no reported injuries heading into the game. The Northeastern Huskies are favored to win by 3.5 points according to the opening betting line. For more insights and expert predictions, be sure to check out our detailed analysis of this exciting matchup. Get ahead with our NCAAB picks and increase your chances of winning big!

Betting Odds

• Moneyline: Fighting Camels +139 | Huskies -168
• Spread: Fighting Camels +3.5 (-110) | Huskies -3.5 (-110)
• Total: Over/Under 141 (-110)
• Based on the moneyline, the implied probability that Northeastern will win straight-up is 63%.

Campbell vs Northeastern Stats

Campbell Fighting Camels

Campbell Fighting Camels have a strong defensive presence, allowing an average of 65.5 points per game and ranking 33rd in the nation in scoring defense. Offensively, they score an average of 71.5 points per game but struggle with shooting, ranking in the bottom half of the nation in field goal and three-point shooting percentages. Their top scorers are Colby Duggan and Jasin Sinani, with Duggan shooting over 50% from the field and Sinani leading in assists. The team is 14-11 this season and ranks 49th in power rankings, with a solid defense and room for improvement on offense.

Northeastern Huskies Analysis

Northeastern Huskies have an average of 70.6 points scored and 70.7 points allowed per game, ranking 275th and 149th respectively. Their shooting percentages are 45.8% overall and 33.5% from three-point range, ranking 129th and 207th. On defense, they allow opponents to shoot 44.3% overall and 35.6% from three-point range, ranking 221st and 306th respectively.

Their top scorers are Rashad King averaging 17.8 points per game and Masai Troutman (out) averaging 13.5 points per game. Harold Woods follows with 11.9 points per game. King leads in assists with 3.5 per game, while Woods leads in rebounds with 7.2 per game. King also leads in steals with 1.5 per game, and Collin Metcalf averages 2.3 blocked shots per contest.

Overall, the Huskies have a power ranking of 252 and are ranked #281 for offense and #146 for defense. They have a record of 12-12 (10-14 ATS). In terms of shooting percentages, they hit an average of 45.19% of their field goals, 69.48% of their free throws, and 33.19% of their three-pointers. On defense, they allow opponents to shoot 44.15% from the field and 70.09% from the free-throw line. They grab an average of 34.92 rebounds per game and average 12.92 offensive assists and 12.96 turnovers per game. Defensively, they allow opponents to shoot 35.23% from three-point range and average 33.13 defensive rebounds per game.

Campbell's Strong Defense Expected to Fuel Victory Against Northeastern

Campbell and Northeastern exhibit similar offensive statistics, with Campbell averaging 71.5 points per game compared to Northeastern's 70.6 points per game. Defensively, Campbell has a slight edge, allowing 65.5 points per game as opposed to Northeastern's 70.7 points per game. Despite playing on the road, Campbell's strong defensive performance is expected to be the determining factor in the upcoming game. The Fighting Camels have held opponents to 44.1% shooting overall and lead the nation in three-point shooting allowed at 27.4%. With a current 7-0 straight up record in the last seven games and a 14-9 ATS record for the season, Campbell has shown consistent success. Conversely, Northeastern has struggled, going 4-3 ATS in their last seven games and 11-14 ATS for the season. Northeastern has only covered the spread in one of their last five home games, while Campbell has covered in four of their last five away games.

Sources: [ 2 ] [ 3 ]