SportsJaw
LeaderboardToday's GamesBest BetsConsensus PicksMake Picks
Login / Sign In
Today's GamesLatest PredictionsToday’s Best BetsConsensus PicksTeam PredictionsHead-to-Head MatchupsSJ CoinsAbout SportsJawContact UsLogin / Sign In
HomeMatchupsMake PicksLeaders
SportsJaw

The social platform for sports bettors.

Explore SportsJaw

  • Today’s Picks
  • Predictions
  • Best Bets
  • Leaderboard
  • Make Picks
  • Consensus Picks
  • Team Predictions
  • Head-to-Head
  • Game Briefing

Picks by Sport

  • NFL Picks
  • NCAAF Picks
  • NBA Picks
  • NCAAB Picks
  • MLB Picks
  • NHL Picks

About SportsJaw

  • How It Works
  • SJ Coins
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us

21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Picks are opinions, not guarantees. Past results do not predict future outcomes.

© 2026 SportsJaw. For entertainment purposes only. SportsJaw does not accept or place wagers.

NCAAB picks›Ill.-Chicago Flames vs Valparaiso Crusaders history

Ill.-Chicago Flames versus Valparaiso Crusaders Head-to-head history

Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history. Valparaiso Crusaders have won the last 2 meetings against the Ill.-Chicago Flames. The latest result was the Valparaiso Crusaders' 71-67 win on February 21, 2026.

SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.

Head-to-head history

Last five meetings

Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results

Feb 21, 2026ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Valparaiso CrusadersVALPO71+270 W+7.5 (-110) W
O 138.5 (-110) L
U 138.5 (-110) W
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI67-345 L-7.5 (-110) L

Valparaiso Crusaders defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 71-67

Valparaiso Crusaders defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 71-67 on February 21, 2026, a 4-point decision in the series. Valparaiso Crusaders' strongest period was the 1st half, when it outscored its opponent 31-29. Against SportsJaw's recorded Valparaiso Crusaders +7.5 (-110) spread, Valparaiso Crusaders covered, while the 138 combined points finished under the recorded total of 138.5.

Team12T
Valparaiso Crusaders314071
Ill.-Chicago Flames293867
Jan 4, 2026ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI59+135 L+2.5 (-110) L
O 144.5 (-110) L
U 144.5 (-110) W
Valparaiso CrusadersVALPO66-155 W-2.5 (-110) W

Valparaiso Crusaders defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 66-59

Valparaiso Crusaders defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 66-59 on January 4, 2026, a 7-point decision in the series. Valparaiso Crusaders' strongest period was the 2nd half, when it outscored its opponent 35-27. Against SportsJaw's recorded Ill.-Chicago Flames +2.5 (-110) spread, Valparaiso Crusaders covered, while the 125 combined points finished under the recorded total of 144.5.

Team12T
Ill.-Chicago Flames322759
Valparaiso Crusaders313566
Jan 18, 2025ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI81-126 W-1.5 (-110) W
O 151.25 (-110) W
U 151.25 (-110) L
Valparaiso CrusadersVALPO74+107 L+1.5 (-110) L

Ill.-Chicago Flames defeated Valparaiso Crusaders 81-74

Team12T
Ill.-Chicago Flames384381
Valparaiso Crusaders383674
Jan 20, 2024ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI77-160 L-3.5 (-110) L
O 136 (-110) W
U 136 (-110) L
Valparaiso CrusadersVALPO84+135 W+3.5 (-110) W
Jan 6, 2024ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Valparaiso CrusadersVALPO64+563 L+12.5 (-110) W
O 138 (-110) L
U 138 (-110) W
Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI70-820 W-12.5 (-110) L
Verified performance

Experts who know these teams

Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.

1CoolioWeighted grade84+$145 · 10 picks6–4 W–L · 60.0%2CaptainobviousWeighted grade34-$20 · 4 picks2–2 W–L · 50.0%3StevedWeighted grade31+$909 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
RankHandicapperGradeProfit
4Covers2–2 W–L · 50.0%28-$385Oddsshark4–8 W–L · 33.3%28-$4386Covergirl0–1 W–L · 0.0%16-$2507Johnmizner0–1 W–L · 0.0%7-$1,0008Bankrollin0–1 W–L · 0.0%5-$110

Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.