| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 97 | -145 W | -2.5 (-110) W | O 148.5 (-110) W U 148.5 (-110) L |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 81 | +125 L | +2.5 (-110) L |
Wright St. Raiders defeated Ill.-Chicago Flames 97-81
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. Raiders |
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 97 | -145 W | -2.5 (-110) W | O 148.5 (-110) W U 148.5 (-110) L |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 81 | +125 L | +2.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. Raiders |
| 52 |
| 45 |
| 97 |
| Ill.-Chicago Flames | 46 | 35 | 81 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 72 | +250 L | +7 (-110) L | O 143.5 (-110) W U 143.5 (-110) L |
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 90 | -305 W | -7 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago Flames | 35 | 37 | 72 |
| Wright St. Raiders | 42 | 48 | 90 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 73 | +220 W | +6 (-110) W | O 147.5 (-110) L U 147.5 (-110) W |
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 56 | -265 L | -6 (-110) L |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 58 | +503 L | +11.5 (-110) L | O 148.25 (-110) L U 148.25 (-110) W |
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 75 | -652.5 W | -11.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 72 | -285 L | -6.5 (-110) L | O 143.5 (-110) W U 143.5 (-110) L |
| Ill.-Chicago FlamesILCHI | 76 | +240 W | +6.5 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
OddssharkWeighted grade39-$49 · 8 picks4–4 W–L · 50.0%2
RainmanWeighted grade30+$227 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%3
PeytoncWeighted grade28+$227 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
Gustavosinto1–0 W–L · 100.0%27+$2275
Covers2–2 W–L · 50.0%25-$386
Cassanoking1–0 W–L · 100.0%21+$1007
17076629050–1 W–L · 0.0%21-$1108
Jeffjackson0–1 W–L · 0.0%21-$1109
Dearl8471–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$10010
Draco22_2–0 W–L · 100.0%18+$20011
Coolio1–3 W–L · 25.0%16-$23912
Destiny090–1 W–L · 0.0%16-$27513
Roycejacobs0–1 W–L · 0.0%16-$27514DFDfsportsace1–0 W–L · 100.0%15+$10015
Amp22230–1 W–L · 0.0%15-$11016
Mikehuff0–1 W–L · 0.0%14-$27517SHShtpicks1–1 W–L · 50.0%13-$1018
Dwhit1–0 W–L · 100.0%12+$50019
Bankroll1–0 W–L · 100.0%12+$10020
Jtpham0–1 W–L · 0.0%12-$550Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.