| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 12 | +145 L | +3.5 (-110) L | O 37.5 (-110) W U 37.5 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 28 | -167 W | -3.5 (-110) W |
Wake Forest Demon Deacons defeated North Carolina Tar Heels 28-12
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 12 | +145 L | +3.5 (-110) L | O 37.5 (-110) W U 37.5 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 28 | -167 W | -3.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
| 4 |
|---|
| T |
|---|
| UNC | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 28 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 24 | +320 L | +10.5 (-110) W | O 64 (-110) L U 64 (-110) W |
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 31 | -425 W | -10.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 3 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 24 |
| UNC | 0 | 10 | 14 | 7 | 31 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 36 | +168 W | +4.5 (-110) W | O 79 (-110) L U 79 (-110) W |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 34 | -195 L | -4.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC | 14 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 36 |
| WAKE | 7 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 34 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 55 | +118 L | +2.5 (-110) L | O 78 (-110) W U 78 (-110) L |
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 58 | -135 W | -2.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 53 | +350 L | +13 (-110) W | O 71 (-110) W U 71 (-110) L |
| North Carolina Tar HeelsUNC | 59 | -450 W | -13 (-110) L |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
Destiny09Weighted grade40+$375 · 4 picks2–2 W–L · 50.0%2
Altuve27Weighted grade36+$634 · 2 picks1–1 W–L · 50.0%3
MtgoldsteinWeighted grade31+$909 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
Oddsshark3–2 W–L · 60.0%31+$815
Leadpipe_Locks1–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$9096
Tbone911–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$9097
Simonsays1–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$2508
PremierPicks1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$919
DengWins1–1 W–L · 50.0%24-$4510
Johnnylikescash1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$10011
Coolio1–1 W–L · 50.0%20-$912
Steveh1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$9113
16930207491–1 W–L · 50.0%19$014
Rcobbett220–3 W–L · 0.0%19-$30015
Sfdan0–1 W–L · 0.0%18-$1001611884602071–0 W–L · 100.0%16+$45517
Doclocks1–0 W–L · 100.0%13+$9118
Peytonc0–1 W–L · 0.0%13-$10019
Reno2470–1 W–L · 0.0%13-$11020
Covers1–2 W–L · 33.3%13-$129Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.