| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 83 | -146 W | -2.5 (-110) W | O 142.75 (-110) W U 142.75 (-110) L |
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 75 | +123 L | +2.5 (-110) L |
Richmond Spiders defeated Fordham Rams 83-75
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICHM | 33 | 50 | 83 |
| FORDM | 28 | 47 | 75 |
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 83 | -146 W | -2.5 (-110) W | O 142.75 (-110) W U 142.75 (-110) L |
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 75 | +123 L | +2.5 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICHM | 33 | 50 | 83 |
| FORDM | 28 | 47 | 75 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 66 | -118 L | -1 (-110) L | O 139.5 (-110) L U 139.5 (-110) W |
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 70 | -104 W | +1 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORDM | 26 | 40 | 66 |
| RICHM | 27 | 43 | 70 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 83 | -137 W | -2 (-110) W | O 139.5 (-110) W U 139.5 (-110) L |
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 69 | +115 L | +2 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICHM | 42 | 41 | 83 |
| FORDM | 33 | 36 | 69 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 58 | +170 L | +4.5 (-110) L | O 135.5 (-110) L U 135.5 (-110) W |
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 68 | -200 W | -4.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond SpidersRICHM | 83 | -370 W | -8 (-110) W | O 140.5 (-110) W U 140.5 (-110) L |
| Fordham RamsFORDM | 70 | +290 L | +8 (-110) L |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
JohnnywalkerWeighted grade28+$455 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%2
SfdanWeighted grade27+$545 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%3
CassanokingWeighted grade26+$500 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
Hitmanhart1–0 W–L · 100.0%26+$4555
Dawhiz2–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$1,3646
Thetotaler1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$4557
MauriceJones1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$9098
Peytonc1–0 W–L · 100.0%24+$9099
Roycejacobs1–0 W–L · 100.0%21+$22710
Amp22231–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$10011
Coolio2–2 W–L · 50.0%20-$2812
Kentc_1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$45513
Mtgoldstein1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$45514
Doclocks0–1 W–L · 0.0%19-$10015
Miamimike0–1 W–L · 0.0%19-$10016
Hopkinspicks0–1 W–L · 0.0%18-$10017
Geauxtigers1–0 W–L · 100.0%17+$90918
Tpham1–0 W–L · 100.0%17+$90919
Jtpham1–0 W–L · 100.0%16+$90920
Cassanomagic11–0 W–L · 100.0%16+$100Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.