| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 69 | — — | +5.5 (-110) L | O n/a (-110) — U n/a (-110) — |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 75 | — — | -5.5 (-110) W |
Wright St.RaidersHead-to-head historyScores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 69 | — — | +5.5 (-110) L | O n/a (-110) — U n/a (-110) — |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 75 | — — | -5.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 69 | — — | +12 (-110) W | O 130.5 (-110) W U 130.5 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 75 | — — | -12 (-110) L |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wright St. RaidersWRIGH | 69 | — — | +14.5 (-110) W | O 131 (-110) W U 131 (-110) L |
| Clemson TigersCLEMS | 75 | — — | -14.5 (-110) L |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
SimonsaysWeighted grade25+$100 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%2
TexasgWeighted grade23+$100 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%3
Amp2223Weighted grade11-$110 · 1 picks0–1 W–L · 0.0%Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.