Milwaukee Brewers vs
Chicago CubsPredictions & Preview

Expert Analysis and Insights for Milwaukee Brewers vs. Chicago Cubs Match-Up at Wrigley Field

tune in to our expert analysis and insights to help you make an informed decision on this exciting match-up between the Milwaukee Brewers and Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field.

Betting Odds

• Moneyline: Brewers +102 | Cubs -120
• Spread: Brewers -1.5 (+172) | Cubs +1.5 (-210)
• Total: Over/Under 9 (-110)
• Based on the moneyline, the implied probability that Chicago will win straight-up is 55%.

Milwaukee Brewers

The Milwaukee Brewers have been on a hot streak, winning two out of three against Cincinnati and going 9-1 in their last ten games. They have called up right-hander Chad Patrick to start against Chicago, who has had success in both the minor and major leagues. The team has been dominant in August, winning 14 out of 15 games and taking an eight-game lead over Chicago in the NL Central standings. Despite their recent success, there is still plenty of baseball left to be played. No injuries have been reported for Monday's game against the Cubs.

Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs have a record of 70-53 SU, 57-66 RL, and 56-56-11 ATS, winning two out of three games in their previous series against Pittsburgh. The team is 5-5 in their last ten games, with the under being 8-1-1. Cubs manager Craig Counsell mentioned that right-hander Jameson Taillon could potentially start the second game of Monday's doubleheader, his first game with the team since June 29 due to a calf strain. Despite a successful first half of the season, the Cubs have struggled since the All-Star break, going 12-14 and falling to second in the NL Central standings behind the red-hot Milwaukee Brewers. The Cubs have not reported any new injuries for Monday's game against the Brewers.

Expert Prediction: Brewers vs. Cubs Showdown - Who Will Prevail?

Discover which team will emerge victorious in the upcoming matchup between NL Central division rivals, the Brewers and the Cubs, by reading our carefully analyzed prediction.

Sources: [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ]